Behind the Masks - WWII Veterans: “A Whole Gay World Had Come Out”

Frank Burton, Fear of Reprisal, and Gossip Networks (late 1940s)

As a serviceperson during the war, Frank Burton (pseudonym; OC 49) felt that he and other gay and bisexual men “were able to not only lead a double live, but so freely, that people looking right at us never saw it.” He remembered, for instance, a “very masculine” serviceman easily picking him up in a pub, all the time surrounded by ostensibly heterosexual bar patrons. Burton contrasted this “freedom” with the post-war McCarthy era, at Oberlin and other parts of the country, in which LGBT people were increasingly “unmasked” and punished. But while it may have been easier to maintain a “double life” during wartime, exposure was still disastrous. Burton recalled that one Army friend “ended up in the stockades” after he was reported as gay.

At Oberlin, where he returned from service in 1946, Burton was part of a loosely organized cluster of friends whose primarily shared interest was sex with men, in contrast to Wood’s and Brenner’s groups that also organized around a shared sense of identity and culture. The latter groups “probably evolved out of the actual studies,” Burton said, “and I wasn’t a good student back in those days.” Instead, Burton “used to go out and get drunk all the time, and carried on with a wild crowd.” He felt that the tension of leading a “double life” led him to drink, but this did not mean that he internalized negative social views about homosexuality. “It was just natural for me,” Burton recalled. “I just felt like, I wish I had more freedom.”

Burton was not alone. Even as many gay students and faculty developed rich gay circles and networks on campus, most were secretive and cautious in public, and developed heterosexual personas to “mask” their gay lives. At Oberlin, “you just had to play a role; that was all there was to it,” Burton recalled. “And you were always in danger…of placing yourself in some sort of social jeopardy.” The consequences were very real. In 1939, Ohio had become one of the first states to enact what became known as a “psychopathic offender” law, which made it legal to subject people convicted of criminal activities such as sodomy to possible institutionalization and “cure.” Lobotomies were not unheard of, and as late as 1971, claims were made that many of the sex criminals sent to the Northwest Ohio’s Lima State Hospital for the Criminally Insane were kept there well beyond the time they should have been and frequently abused.[76]

Burton also knew of a student who was expelled from Oberlin after being reported as a “queer”—a fate that befell growing numbers of gay and lesbian students at American institutions in the two decades after World War II. His closest gay and bisexual friends “thought it was a travesty,” and were frightened, he remembered, yet “they were scared all the time anyway. You were scared to death that you’d get on the wrong side of the authorities.”

In order to protect each other and make sense of campus events, gay and bisexual students exchanged information by word of mouth. In other words, they gossiped, an invaluable mode of communication during a time in which no printed information about LGBT campus life was avaialable. Brenner recalled speculating with his friends about a faculty member who “ran through the woods and killed himself,” for instance. They concluded he was homosexual; “Why else would you do that?” Gay and bisexual students also shared information about faculty and administrators who were perceived as threats. When Burton spotted a faculty member identified by students as hostile to homosexuals at the notoriously cruisy Everard Turkish Baths in New York City, he also “passed that all around” at Oberlin. “And then the consensus of opinion [was that] he was trying to protect himself by pointing fingers at everybody else,” Burton recalled.

< previous | next >



Post a Comment
1 Comment

JqqebNHJuyWDKtpFr

One thing all these comments show is that cmoing out is a quite variable experience. It does depend a lot on the person, the situation and the others to whom he comes out.Many have a good experience and receive affirmation and support. Some have a very bad experience. Recent research shows that 50% of Americans aged 18 and over agree that Homosexuality should be accepted by society. Acceptance does vary by age or generation. Among those 18-29, almost one-third (63%) agree with the statement. There is less support among older generations: 30-49, 51%; those 50-64, 48%; those 65+, 35%. I think it’s pretty good that just over one-third of OLD people accept the legitimacy of homosexuality.One of the more surprising findings for some people is that among traditional Christian groups, Catholics are the most accepting of the idea that homosexuality should be accepted by society. Over half (58%) of all Catholics and a whopping 72% of young Catholics accept the idea of the legitimacy of homosexuality. For other Christian groups the respective percentages are: Mainline White Protestants: 56%, 69%. For Black Protestants: 39%, 51%. for Evangelical Christians: 26%, 39%. Besides Catholic acceptance two other noteworthy findings: Young Blacks are much more accepting than their older generations, and, even Evangelical youth are increasingly more tolerant/accepting of homosexuality.These results show that young people have a much better climate in which to come out. Yea!!!But I’m still concerned about those in junior high and high school. So many (not just gays) are confused about a lot of things, not just sexual orientation or behavior. These years can be very difficult. There are all kinds of competitions during junior hi and high school.I have worked diligently for anti-bullying laws: the Matthew Shepherd Law at the Federal level and a new, expanded anti-bulling law here in NC,because of severe bullying og gays or those other kids perceive as being gay. Along with other minorities gays are frequently harassed, bullied, or beaten up just because they are gay. Some are driven to suicide.These young people should stand tall about their orientation. But they, more so than college students and other adult gays, must be circumspect about the decisions they make and the public ramifications of their decisions to come out.They, more than adults, require and deserve greater support and love. I long for the day, and will work tirelessly, that whenever we come out as gay, it will truly be no more exceptional than announcing that we are left-handed.BTW, I AM left-handed and you might be surprised that southpaws are teased, made fun of and must fit into a right-handed world.

Reply to this comment

Posted by Muhammad on May 15, 2012

 

Post a Comment

Click here to cancel "reply" 



  • Search:

  • Introduction

  • The Interwar Period:

    Shifting Boundaries

  • WWII Veterans:

    "A Whole Gay World Had Come Out"

    • Introduction

    • George Brenner and a Gay History Circle (late 1940s)

    • Robert Wood, the Seminary, and the "Throne Room" (late 1940s)

    • Frank Burton, Fear of Reprisal, and Gossip Networks (late 1940s)

    • Bars and Barns: Off-Campus "Gay Worlds" (late 1940s)

    • The Kinsey Report, Sexual Identity, and Oberlin Tearooms (late 1940s)

  • Professor Frederick Artz and the Cultural Stance of the "Queer"

  • 1950s/early 1960s:

    Homosexuals as Mentally Ill and Homosexuals as "Musical"

  • 1960s:

    Civil Rights, Social Rules, and the Sexual Revolution

  • Early/Mid 1970s:

    Gay Liberation, the Women's Movement, Black Power, and the Left

  • Epilogue

  • Contact

    Send feedback and find out how you can participate

  • Support

    Learn how you can help maintain this web resource



Home | Behind the Masks | Into the Pink | Personal Histories | Historical Documents | Share Your Story | Links